Mark Zuckerberg Gives 'Social Network' an Oscar Shove
By naming Facebook's Mark Zuckerberg Person of the Year, Time ups The Social Network's Oscar odds a little, and clarifies the lies that make it great.
In what Steve Pond calls “the niftiest bit of Oscar promotion anybody has gotten this year,” Time's story demonstrates what the film gets artfully wrong. "The Zuckerberg of the movie is a simple creature of clear motivations: he uses his outsize gifts as a programmer to acquire girls, money and party invitations. This is a fiction." Real Zuckerberg already had the girl he lives with now in a preposterously modest house. "One of the interests Zuckerberg lists on his Facebook page is 'Eliminating Desire.'"
Jesse Eisenberg's movie Zuckerberg (which got SAG and Globe best actor noms this week) is an icy no-friend zone with eyes shifty as a Gila monster scanning for flies to seize with his cold, fast, sticky tongue. Real Zuckerberg, says Time, is "a warm presence, not a cold one. He has a quick smile and doesn't shy away from eye contact. He thinks fast and talks fast, but he wants you to keep up. He exudes not anger or social anxiety but a weird calm. When you talk to his co-workers, they're so adamant in their avowals of affection for him and in their insistence that you not misconstrue his oddness that you get the impression it's not just because they want to keep their jobs. People really like him."
But the real Zuckerberg on, say, 60 Minutes, is a genial bore. Movie Zuckerberg is fascinating, kinetic, a human Moebius strip with no inside. Writer Aaron Sorkin crafts reality into a soaring moral fable. Movies about real people need not be true. Jesus wears a crown of thorns in Mel Gibson's The Passion of the Christ. The real Jesus probably didn't, says Garry Wills: thorns didn't grow in Jerusalem, rulers didn't wear crowns but wreaths or diadems, and the bible's word "akanthon" can mean either "thorn" or "acanthus." So Jesus wore an acanthus-leaf crown. "I defer to the authorities," says critic David Thomson, "but when you're making a movie, a crown of thorns is a hell of a lot better."
The creation of Eisenberg, Sorkin, and director David Fincher is a hell of a lot better than real Zuckerberg. But people don't really like him. They like stuttering kings, struggling fighters, huggable lesbians, even unbalanced ballerinas. The Social Network's chillier, exquisite fiction may lose the Oscar precisely because it's such a ruthlessly beautiful untruth.
- Prince Takes Over the 'Arsenio Hall Show,' Debuts New Funky Song
- A Train, a Trestle and 60 Seconds to Escape: How 'Midnight Rider' Victim Sarah Jones Lost Her Life
- 'Divergent' Star Shailene Woodley: The Next Jennifer Lawrence?
- 'Noah' Banned in Several Middle Eastern Countries
- Lindsay Lohan's OWN Series Gets First Official Trailer (Video)
- MOST SHARED
- MOST POPULAR
Covering The Race
Lead Awards Blogger & Analyst
Scott, whose THR coverage appears both in print and online, is one of the film industry's most experienced and trusted awards analysts, and possesses one of the strongest track records at forecasting the Oscars. His best showings came in 2006 and 2013, when he called 21 of 24 winners; he was also the only pundit to project long-shot best picture nominations for The Reader (2008), The Blind Side (2009) and Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close (2011). An alumnus of Brandeis University, he previously ran "The Feinberg Files" blog for the Los Angeles Times. He is now a voting member of both the Broadcast Film Critics Association and the Broadcast Television Journalists Association, and is writing a book about film history for young people for which he has interviewed more than 350 high-profile Hollywood figures.
Gregg contributes awards news, features online, and "The Race" column in print.
Tim contributes awards news and features, both in print and online.