'Waiting for Superman' Wins, But Can It Beat 'Inside Job'?
The Gotham Independent Film Awards just gave its first Festival Genius Audience Award to Davis Guggenheim's skewering of the U.S. education system, Waiting for Superman. The judges were online movie fans, not Independent Filmmaker Project dignitaries, so maybe the populist nature of the honor gives Guggenheim a little push ahead of his likeliest rival Oscar contender, Charles Ferguson's Inside Job, about the flabbergastingly impenitent zealots of Wall Street. Guggenheim hopes Waiting for Superman will do for education reform what his Oscar winner An Inconvenient Truth did for global warming. Ferguson, an Oscar nominee for the Iraq war doc No End in Sight, hopes Inside Job will be the Inconvenient Truth of financial reform.
They're both dramatic, cinematic works of art at the front of the documentary Oscar line, and either could make history as the first-ever documentary to win best picture. Which is unlikely, since neither features an Al Gore-sized heavyweight celeb and the complicated subjects are less like a disaster blockbuster than An Inconvenient Truth was.
Even before the Gotham honor, Waiting for Superman was ahead in the Oscar promotion race, and in grosses. But some say Inside Job is even more important. "It's great -- the first film to expose the truth behind the economic crisis of 2008," says a documentary Oscar voter. "It's the most powerful thing. We were blindsided! They were creating these shit mortgage pies ... resulting in millions of people losing their homes and jobs. It's almost like the Mafia running the show. All this is explained so clearly."
There's no denying the visceral emotional impact of seeing the financial titans defy logic and deny any scintilla of guilt in Inside Job. Waiting for Superman is equally emotional, showing another untouchable elite (the educational establishment), which the filmmaker argues is destroying America's future. But Inside Job makes you feel rage and hopelessness, like victims of Tony Soprano, while Waiting for Superman shows a few rays of hope amid the overwhelming hopelessness. Not to spoil the suspense, but not every schoolchild in Guggenheim's film is crushed by the system. Don't Oscar voters habitually vote for stories of hope against all odds?
Not this voter. "No, I don't think they go for the ray of hope, because [Inside Job] is so significant." And he thinks the larger Oscar voter pool should kick its addiction to uplifting sagas and strike a blow for Ferguson's inconvenient truths. "This should be the best picture."
- 'Lindsay' Recap: Lohan Attempts Career Comeback With Self-Proclaimed 'New Chapter'
- 'How I Met Your Mother': Cristin Milioti Debunks Morbid Finale Theory (Video)'
- Josh Duhamel to Co-Star in Vince Gilligan's 'Battle Creek'
- A Train, a Trestle and 60 Seconds to Escape: How 'Midnight Rider' Victim Sarah Jones Lost Her Life
- 'Divergent' Star Shailene Woodley: The Next Jennifer Lawrence?
- MOST SHARED
- MOST POPULAR
Covering The Race
Lead Awards Blogger & Analyst
Scott, whose THR coverage appears both in print and online, is one of the film industry's most experienced and trusted awards analysts, and possesses one of the strongest track records at forecasting the Oscars. His best showings came in 2006 and 2013, when he called 21 of 24 winners; he was also the only pundit to project long-shot best picture nominations for The Reader (2008), The Blind Side (2009) and Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close (2011). An alumnus of Brandeis University, he previously ran "The Feinberg Files" blog for the Los Angeles Times. He is now a voting member of both the Broadcast Film Critics Association and the Broadcast Television Journalists Association, and is writing a book about film history for young people for which he has interviewed more than 350 high-profile Hollywood figures.
Gregg contributes awards news, features online, and "The Race" column in print.
Tim contributes awards news and features, both in print and online.