Is 'Avatar' really immune from piracy?
He's followed others in the industry, such as DreamWorks Animation CEO Jeffrey Katzenberg, who was one of the first to posit that one can't camcord 3D cinema.
Is it really true? Can 3D glasses accomplish what no industry lawyer has been able to do in holding back the pirates?
Cameron may be a visionary, but we're betting he's dead wrong here.
According to a story in the UK's The Times, "Avatar" was illegally downloaded almost one million times within seven days of its release—a record. By comparison, "New Moon" was pirated 610,000 times in the same time period. Word that "Avatar" is an underground hit follows overlooked news that "Avatar" leaked onto file-sharing websites a few days before it hit theaters.
The film is doing amazing boxoffice anyway. And if there was ever a poster child for the argument that online pirates merely check out "event" films for free before going to theaters for the real experience, this would be it. But we're sure that 20th Century Fox has high hopes for the future DVD release of the film, which could be hampered by rampant filesharing.
A few months ago, a UK scientist examined the question of whether 3D films are immune to piracy. He proposed that future pirates might eventually attach a 3D glasses-type filter to their camcorders or set up two cameras in the theater so as to recreate the 3D experience at home.
In fact, we'll go out on a limb and predict that the introduction of 3D will only escalate the piracy/copyright battles, as studios refine their technology with DRM, pirates respond, and court battles ensue.
One of these days, we bet we'll be reporting that someone is claiming 3D glasses as a copyright circumvention device.
Sundance: On the Scene