EDITIONS:   US | Int’l | Asia | Print
Subscribe Subscribe| Advertise Advertise| Newsletters Newsletters| HCD HCD| Jobs Jobs| Log In Log In| About About
More Television News

» Fox-O'Brien talks still in preliminary stages

» Miranda Cosgrove signs on for more 'iCarly'

» WWE, hosts reap WrestleMania's rewards

The Live Feed
Special Reports

» Pilot season does the time warp

» WGA Awards

» Reinventing NATPE

Get Box Office Alerts via Mobile        FREE Newsletters

Fox moves 'Canterbury's Law'

By James Hibberd

March 21, 2008, ET

Two weeks after its debut, Fox is moving legal drama "Canterbury's Law" from Monday nights to Friday.

Starting next week, "Law" will be replaced by repeats of "House."

For its March 10 debut, "Canterbury's" had a 1.7 rating among adults 18 to 49, Fox's lowest-rated premiere ever in the time period. This week, "Canterbury's" was flat.

Fox's midseason scripted dramas "Canterbury's" and "New Amsterdam" were originally scheduled for Friday, then Fox moved them to a more visible time period when the writers strike made scripted programming a scarce commodity.

"Amsterdam" has held up better than "Canterbury's," averaging a 2.4, but still has come in fourth place for the hour.




Fox moves 'Canterbury's Law'

By James Hibberd

March 21, 2008, ET

Two weeks after its debut, Fox is moving legal drama "Canterbury's Law" from Monday nights to Friday.

Starting next week, "Law" will be replaced by repeats of "House."

For its March 10 debut, "Canterbury's" had a 1.7 rating among adults 18 to 49, Fox's lowest-rated premiere ever in the time period. This week, "Canterbury's" was flat.

Fox's midseason scripted dramas "Canterbury's" and "New Amsterdam" were originally scheduled for Friday, then Fox moved them to a more visible time period when the writers strike made scripted programming a scarce commodity.

"Amsterdam" has held up better than "Canterbury's," averaging a 2.4, but still has come in fourth place for the hour.







 


Post a Comment
Asterisk (*) is a required field.
* Username: 
Rate This Article: (1=Bad, 5=Perfect)

*Comment: