Why Horror Films Are Dying at the Box Office
Save for a few titles, the genre suffers as young people flee the multiplex.
Only a few years ago, a new horror movie was considered as close to a sure thing as anything Hollywood produced. From 2005 to 2009, studios like Lionsgate, Screen Gems, New Line and Dimension made millions releasing hit after hit, grossing north of $50 million at the domestic box office on low-budget slasher pics and remakes of such genre classics as Friday the 13th and The Amityville Horror. But this summer and fall, title after title has disappointed, capped by a weak $8.5 million opening for Universal's early Halloween entry The Thing, a prequel to John Carpenter's 1982 horror sci-fi pic of the same name. The likely culprit: The flight of younger moviegoers from the multiplex. Heading into the Oct. 14-16 weekend, The Thing was tracking to gross $11 million to $13 million, but the audience needed to achieve those numbers never materialized. Nearly 65 percent of those buying tickets to the movie were over the age of 25, whereas it used to be that moviegoers under 25 powered the genre. Other recent titles that have underperformed include the Guillermo del Toro-produced Don't Be Afraid of the Dark, which has only grossed $23.9 million domestic, Shark Night 3D ($18.7 million), Dream House ($18.4 million) Fright Night ($18. 1 million) and Apollo 18 ($17.5 million). "I don't know what's happening. The young people just aren't there," says Universal president of domestic distribution Nikki Rocco. Chris Aronson, senior vp domestic distribution at 20th Century Fox, was one of the first to notice the decline of younger moviegoers, a trend that began during Christmas 2010 and continues to worsen. "These are the kids who are the stable for this kind of fare," he says. The Paranormal Activity franchise and Insidious are the only horror movies to do big business of late. Despite the genre's overall weakness, many are counting on Paranormal Activity 3 (which is tracking well) to buck the trend when it opens Oct. 21, although last year's Paranormal sequel topped out at $84.8 million domestically compared with the $107.9 million earned by the first film in 2009. Still, the sequel cost just $3 million to produce (the upcoming threequel cost $5 million), a scream compared to most studio franchise pics.
Subscribe now to read the full article
Subscription Benefits
- Read The Hollywood Reporter on any mobile device
- Email complete articles to clients or colleagues
- Interactive Radio: listen to the topics or headlines that interest you
- RSS Feed: read in a timely manner with easy to find content
- Read Offline: locate issues and articles easily at any time, no internet connection needed
Already a Subscriber? Log In
THR's Daily Must Feeds
-
Beyonce: Pregnant with Second Child - Report
-
'Iron Man 3' Superhero Threequel Passes $1 Billion Mark
-
Michael C. Hall: 'Dexter' Season Eight Trailer
-
Shocking Season-Ending Twist On 'Scandal'
-
Justin Bieber Owes Money for Mally the Monkey Left in Germany
-
Saying Goodbye To 'The Office'
-
Sarah Polley Is (Mostly) Ready to Come Clean
-
How Critics Handled 'Star Trek' Into Darkness’s Bad-Guy Secret
In This Week's Magazine
- MOST SHARED
- MOST POPULAR
- 1
Jessica Capshaw from 'Grey's Anatomy': 'Arizona Does Not Forgive Callie'
- 2
Inside Llewyn Davis: Cannes Review
- 3
'How I Met Your Mother' Makes Cristin Milioti a Series Regular
- 4
Cannes Jewel Heist: Inside Job Suspected, Hotel Employees Being Questioned
- 5
It's Official: 'The Voice' Bringing Back Original Coaches for Season 5
- 6
'Scandal' Case Study: Shonda Rhimes on Season 3, Olivia and Fitz's Future
- 7
'Anchorman 2' Teaser: News Team Assembles for More One-Liners (Video)
- 8
Ken Venturi, Famed CBS Sports Golf Analyst, Dies at 82
- 9
YouTube Breakout Ray William Johnson Sells Comedy to FX (Exclusive)
- 10
'Big Bang Theory': A Behind the Scenes Diary of the Sweet Season 6 Finale


