WikiLeaks' Julian Assange Wins Hearing for Appeal Against Extradition to Sweden
The whistleblower site pioneer, who faces rape and sexual assault charges in Scandinavian territory, lands February date in U.K. Supreme Court.
LONDON – WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange has won the right to appeal against his extradition to Sweden to face rape allegations in the U.K.’s highest court, the Supreme Court.
The case was granted a hearing in the Supreme Court here because the Australian-born WikiLeaks founder's situation raises a question on extradition law "of general public importance,” reports said.
His appeal, according to British press reports, will be heard by a panel of seven of the 12 supreme court justices "given the great public importance of the issue raised, which is whether a prosecutor is a judicial authority," according to a Supreme Court spokesman.
PHOTOS: 10 TV Trials That Shook the World
The spokesman is reported as saying: "The supreme court has today considered an application by Julian Assange for permission to appeal to the court, following the divisional court's certification of a point of law of general public importance.
"A panel of three supreme court justices – Lord Hope, Lord Mance and Lord Dyson – has considered the written submissions of the parties; this is the court's usual practice for considering applications for permission to appeal.
"The appeal hearing is set for two days, beginning February 1, 2012."
In November, Assange lost his appeal in the U.K. courts against extradition to Sweden to face rape allegations.
Assange had taken his battle to the High Court but the judges ruled that the Australian-born WikiLeaks founder would have to face extradition to the Scandinavian territory to face the allegations.
The British media was awash with the ruling at the time including reports in The Guardian and The Daily Mail made by Lord Justice Thomas and Mr Justice Ouseley.
Assange was given 14 days to seek leave to appeal to the Supreme Court in the U.K. if he believes there is a wider issue of "public importance" at stake in the decision.
The court thinks there is.
THR's Daily Must Feeds
-
Joss Whedon Says Tom Hiddleston Won't Return For 'Avengers' Sequel
-
Ben Savage: 'Girl Meets World' Gets Series Order from Disney
-
Brad Pitt Talks Angelina Jolie on 'Good Morning America'
-
Mumford Bass Player Updates Fans On Status
-
Leonardo DiCaprio: 'Wolf of Wall Street' Trailer
-
'Man Of Steel' Box Office Wows As Film Brings In $125 Million
-
'True Blood’s' Kristin Bauer van Straten on the Pam-Tara Sex Scene We All Missed
-
Paul Feig Explains His Cultural Influences
In This Week's Magazine
- MOST SHARED
- MOST POPULAR
- 1
'The Voice' Finale Recap: Season 4 Winner Is Crowned
- 2
Bruce Lee Statue Unveiled in L.A.'s Chinatown
- 3
Robin Thicke Criticized For 'Rapey' 'Blurred Lines' Lyrics, Videos
- 4
'Big Brother 15': First Look at the Brand-New House
- 5
BuzzFeed Reporter Michael Hastings Dies in Car Accident at Age 33
- 6
'Pretty Little Liars': Another Clue Into Alison's Death Is Revealed
- 7
It's Official: Selma Blair Not Returning to 'Anger Management'
- 8
Russell Brand Chastises 'Morning Joe' Hosts in Interview Gone Awry (Video)
- 9
J. Cole's 'Born Sinner': What the Critics Are Saying
- 10
Kanye West's 'Yeezus': What the Critics Are Saying



