Warner Bros. Sued by Louis Vuitton Over 'Hangover II' Handbag
The Hangover Part II is making a strong case for being named most-litigated movie of 2011. Even as Warner Bros. has moved in recent weeks to settle a rash of litigation stemming from the blockbuster comedy sequel, a new lawsuit has been filed over a handbag featured in the film.
PHOTOS: 'The Hangover' Stars Before They Were Famous
Luxury fashion brand Louis Vuitton filed suit in federal court in New York on Thursday alleging that a handbag featured in the movie is a fakery. In the scene, the character played by Zach Galifianakis carries a bag marked LVM and admonishes another character: “Careful, that is.. that is a Louis Vuitton.”
But the complaint (posted in full here by Paid Content) alleges that the bag is instead made by the Chinese American company Diophy, which Louis Vuitton is currently suing in an attempt to prevent knock-off items from being sold in the U.S.
Louis Vuitton says it has been damaged by the consumer confusion ("Careful, that is a Louis Vuitton." has supposedly become a catchphrase) and claims that Warners has refused to alter the scene before the movie is released on DVD.
A Warners spokesman declined to comment on the suit.
PHOTOS: 10 Most Pirated Movies of All Time
As we've reported, Hangover II has become something of a litigation magnet. On the intellectual property front, the studio was sued earlier this year by a tattoo artist who claimed the distinctive mark on Ed Helms' face was an infringement of a tattoo he created for boxer Mike Tyson. That case settled. In October, writer Michael Alan Rubin sued claiming the movie was stolen from his script about his adventures in Asia, including ditching his girlfriend and proposing to a male-to-female transsexual prostitute. That case was dismissed. Warners also settled a case brought by stuntman Scott McLean, who claimed he suffered brain trauma during a stunt gone wrong.
Louis Vuitton is seeking to stop the release of the scenes with the fake handbag, as well as a share of profits from the film. The causes of action include trademark dilution, false designation of origin and unfair competition.
Email: Matthew.Belloni@thr.com
Twitter: @THRMattBelloni
THR's Daily Must Feeds
-
Kim Kardashian and Kris Humphries Divorce Takes Ugly Legal Turn
-
Conflicting Demi Moore Rehab Reports Hit the Web
-
The Rock, Dwayne Johnson, on 'Journey 2,' Fighting At WrestleMania and His Political Future
-
Owen Wilson, Vince Vaughn Movie Reunion in the Works?
-
'Twilight' Director Slams Film Scripts
-
The Best Horror Movies for Date Night
-
Josh Hutcherson on His Journey Pranks and a 'Hunger Games' Surprise!
-
Russell Brand to Katy Perry: I Don't Want Anything From You
-
What is Mitt Romney Missing from His Caucus
- MOST SHARED
- MOST POPULAR
- 1
David Cross Admits to Snorting Cocaine at the White House Correspondents Dinner
- 2
'Two and a Half Men' First Look: Guest Star Patton Oswalt Torments Ashton Kutcher
- 3
Whitney Houston's Purported Last Photo Featured on Cover of Tabloid
- 4
Academy: Sacha Baron Cohen Not 'Banned' From Oscars But 'Dictator' Stunt Unwelcome
- 5
'Seinfeld' Actor In Critical Condition After Self-Inflicted Gunshot to the Head
- 6
FEINBERG FORECAST: Scott's Final Projections for the 84th Academy Awards
- 7
Game Change: TV Review
- 8
Sacha Baron Cohen Wants to Attend Oscars as 'The Dictator'; Will the Academy Let Him? (Exclusive)
- 9
Obama Rewards Loyalists Eva Longoria and Kal Penn With Big Campaign Roles
- 10
TV Pilots 2012: The Complete Guide




