Judge Leans Toward Not Awarding Fees to 'Blurred Lines' Attorneys

Attorneys for Marvin Gaye's heirs are requesting about $3.5 million in fees and expenses related to the lawsuit over Pharrell Williams and Robin Thicke's hit song.
Larry Busacca/Getty Images for NARAS

There are blurred lines when it comes to awarding attorneys fees to the prevailing party in a copyright case, at least in the lawsuit over the 2013 hit of the same name.

Judge John A. Kronstadt says he's "not persuaded there should be an award of fees" to the attorneys and experts hired by Marvin Gaye's heirs. His tentative ruling was issued from the bench Monday.

A jury last March ruled against Pharrell Williams and Robin Thicke, finding their track “Blurred Lines” infringed on Gaye’s 1977 hit “Got to Give It Up.” Kronstadt later awarded $5.3 million in damages plus 50 percent of the song’s future royalties to Gaye’s heirs.

In January, the Gayes’ attorneys asked to tack on almost $3.5 million in fees and expenses, which prompted Team Thicke to respond by questioning the “breathtaking” six-figure paycheck requested for musicologist Judith Finell.

Richard Busch, attorney for the Gayes, argues their victory "encourages the meritorious prosecution of copyright claims" and not reimbursing the heirs for the costs of that pursuit would send a chilling message to others considering legal action over copyrights. 

Busch also says that not only did Team Thicke sue first but they also included a request for fees in that suit and "used the fees as a sword to try to coerce a knowingly financially vulnerable party into giving up.

"They gambled and they lost, and they should pay the consequences for doing so," says Busch.

Thicke's attorney Howard King says the case was novel and "demarcated the boundaries of copyright law" and therefore a fee award is not appropriate.

In the highlight of the hearing, King admits why he thinks he lost the case at trial.

"Robin Thicke committed probably the cardinal sin: He lied to Oprah," says King.

Busch later responded, saying "that's a nice soundbite" but "they lost because they committed copyright infringement."

Both sides argue the outcome will affect future copyright litigation. Busch says if no fee is awarded, then people with legitimate copyright claims will be hesitant to pursue them because of the extreme cost "even in victory." King says having to pay fees when you lose a legitimate, hard-fought case would also set a bad precedent.

Kronstadt says he will make his final decision on the fee award in writing.

comments powered by Disqus