StudioCanal Sues Universal Claiming Millions in Working Title Film Revenue
The suit seeks "tens of millions of dollars and likely more" after an audit showed underreported revenue
Universal Studios has been sued by its former partner in a series of films made by Working Title.
In a lawsuit filed Thursday in Los Angeles Superior Court, StudioCanal claims Universal and parent company NBC Universal have failed to account for "tens of millions of dollars and likely more" from films developed by the Working Title label during a joint venture from 1999 through 2009. France-based StudioCanal and Universal jointly created Working Title when the two companies were both owned by Vivendi. They distributed films in different parts of the world and maintained an obligation to account to each other.
Read the lawsuit here.
While Universal and StudioCanal were partners, they produced and released 44 films, including About a Boy, Billy Eilliot, Love Actually and O Brother Where Art Thou?. When the studio was sold to GE and combined with NBC to create NBC Universal, the duty to account for revenue to StudioCanal remained, according to the suit.
StudioCanal says it performed an audit of six of the films from the joint venture and found millions of dollars in missing revenue.
"Those audits revealed that Universal was violating its fiduciary and contractual obligations to StudioCanal," the lawsuit states. The suit claims Universal hid money from "off-balance-sheet financing arrangements," failed to report ancillary revenue from sources such as music publishing, double-charged the studio for producing fees paid to Working Title, and deducted millions of dollars in "unsubstantiated expenses."
The two sides apparently have been communicating about the audit issues for months but talks have broken down. "In fact, Universal has simply stopped communicating with StudioCanal at all— not even to acknowledge the passing of dates by which Universal had promised a substantive response," the suit states.
THR has reached out to Universal for comment and will update with a response.
The suit, filed by attorneys Robert Schwartz, James Pearl, Harrison Whitman and Nikolas Primack, alleges causes of action for breach of fiduciary duty, constructive fraud, breach of contract, breach of covenant of good faith and fair dealing, account stated and accounting.
Email: Matthew.Belloni@thr.com
Twitter: @THRMattBelloni
THR's Daily Must Feeds
-
Beyonce: Pregnant with Second Child - Report
-
'Iron Man 3' Superhero Threequel Passes $1 Billion Mark
-
Michael C. Hall: 'Dexter' Season Eight Trailer
-
Shocking Season-Ending Twist On 'Scandal'
-
Justin Bieber Owes Money for Mally the Monkey Left in Germany
-
Saying Goodbye To 'The Office'
-
Sarah Polley Is (Mostly) Ready to Come Clean
-
How Critics Handled 'Star Trek' Into Darkness’s Bad-Guy Secret
Follow Esq.
- MOST SHARED
- MOST POPULAR
- 1
Jessica Capshaw from 'Grey's Anatomy': 'Arizona Does Not Forgive Callie'
- 2
Amanda Knox's Former Boyfriend Raffaele Sollecito Appears on 'Today' (Video)
- 3
YouTube Breakout Ray William Johnson Sells Comedy to FX (Exclusive)
- 4
'How I Met Your Mother' Makes Cristin Milioti a Series Regular
- 5
'Big Bang Theory': A Behind the Scenes Diary of the Sweet Season 6 Finale
- 6
Cannes Jewel Heist: Inside Job Suspected, Hotel Employees Being Questioned
- 7
Cannes Panic: Christoph Waltz Rushed Offstage; Man With Suspicious Device Apprehended (Video)
- 8
TV Ratings: 'American Idol' Finale Sheds 7 Million Viewers, 'Office' Finishes Strong
- 9
'Big Bang Theory's' Kunal Nayyar, Kaley Cuoco on Raj's Big Moment
- 10
'Scandal' Case Study: Shonda Rhimes on Season 3, Olivia and Fitz's Future


