Supreme Court Refuses to Hear Joel Tenenbaum Appeal in Music Piracy Case
In 2009, a jury ruled that the Boston student must pay $22,500 for each of 31 songs that he downloaded and shared on the Internet.
The long-running saga of Joel Tenenbaum, the Boston student penalized $675,000 for illegally downloading and sharing 31 songs online, has taken a new turn. The Supreme Court on Monday refused to hear the Boston University PhD student's constitutional challenge to the penalty, which resulted from a lawsuit filed in 2007 by the RIAA. The move is a win for the music industry in its unending crusade against piracy.
In 2009, a jury ruled that Tenenbaum must pay $22,500 per song that he downloaded and shared on the Internet. A federal judge later ruled that penalty to be excessive and reduced it to $67,500 but the 1st Circuit Court of Appeals reinstated the penalty at the request of the RIAA and its member labels.
Tenenbaum, whose case became a hot topic among copyright lawyers, argued that federal copyright laws were not meant to target consumers. He later appealed to the Supreme Court on the argument that the penalty was unconstitutional. But in refusing to hear the case, the High Court is letting stand the appeals court ruling on the constitutionality issue.
Now the case will return to the lower court, which could order the penalty reduced using a different legal reasoning, just not the constitutionality issue.
- MOST SHARED
- MOST POPULAR
- Can You Guess These Famous Lines From Office Space From Just a GIF or Freeze-Frame?
- Make Your Own Shonda Rhimes Monologue With Vulture’s Scandal Monologue Mad-Libs
- Did You Catch the Coen Brothers Easter Egg in Fargo?
- Julie Klausner Talks to Billy Eichner About Billy on the Street, Mayim Bialik, and Getting Fuse to Agree to ‘Ask a Squirter’