The production of a USA Network show was suspended due to Hamas rocket fire into Israel. Terrorism or war? The Ninth Circuit weighs in.

A roundup of recent developments in entertainment and media law, including a long-dormant case about copyright law's anti-hacking provisions.

Ultra-realistic manipulation of digital imagery could open up new horizons for filmmaking, but lawmakers are only beginning to grapple with the issues and unanswered questions it poses.

After the $300 million-plus sale of label Big Machine (and her first six albums) to her nemesis, the pop star could refuse to consent to licenses, choose to rerecord songs or limit future concerts to new music only — but there are major risks, a top lawyer writes.

The FCC's previous children's television rules were adopted in the 1990s.

According to the 2nd Circuit, the First Amendment doesn't allow public officials when using social media accounts for official purposes to exclude others in viewpoint discrimination.

A Los Angeles judge won't order Neal Moritz to arbitration over 'Hobbs & Shaw.' The jilted producer seeks millions in damages. Discovery commences just weeks before the movie opens.

Ownership of recordings is an area of contention between artists and labels, but experts say even a major star like Swift can’t do anything about a $300 million sale that includes her catalog.

The battle now shifts to federal court, as each side accuses the other of violating complex competition statutes.

Despite a revolving roster of attorneys, experts say Weinstein's case is still "extremely defensible."

The lead lawyer for Fox Sports will now also oversee the company's entertainment assets.

The WGA responds that the agencies are the ones violating antitrust law.