- Share this article on Facebook
- Share this article on Twitter
- Share this article on Flipboard
- Share this article on Email
- Show additional share options
- Share this article on Linkedin
- Share this article on Pinit
- Share this article on Reddit
- Share this article on Tumblr
- Share this article on Whatsapp
- Share this article on Print
- Share this article on Comment
A federal judge in Illinois has declined a Comcast request for a temporary restraining order against competitor DirecTV to halt an ad campaign it deemed deceptive.
Comcast sued DirecTV earlier this month claiming that a national campaign was intended to mislead football fans into thinking they would be getting “free” football with with their service. Comcast argued that DirecTV was trying to pull a bait-and-switch, luring fans with “free offers” but actually imposing on them a two-year contract with “hefty” cancellation fees, plus automatic renewal in the second year at the full price.
El Segundo, Calif.-based DirecTV quickly responded by claiming the allegation “borders on absurd.” The actual phrase in its ads is “no extra charge,” the company responded, which has allegedly been transposed to “free” by Comcast “as if it means the same thing.”
Now a federal court has agreed, declining to halt the ad campaign.
DirecTV issued the following statement from Jon Gieselman, its senior vp marketing and direct sales.
“We’re pleased the judge recognized Comcast’s veiled attempt to limit our ability to compete in the marketplace and denied the TRO. We’re happy to go head-to-head with Comcast any day on whose service is superior, so we look forward to competing in the marketplace rather than the courtroom.”
DirecTV Defends Football Commercials Against ‘Deceptive’ Comcast Lawsuit
Comcast Sues DirecTV Over ‘Deceptive’ Claims of ‘Free’ Televised NFL Games
Sign up for THR news straight to your inbox every day