- Share this article on Facebook
- Share this article on Twitter
- Share this article on Flipboard
- Share this article on Email
- Show additional share options
- Share this article on Linkedin
- Share this article on Pinit
- Share this article on Reddit
- Share this article on Tumblr
- Share this article on Whatsapp
- Share this article on Print
- Share this article on Comment
A federal judge has rejected a requested injunction that would bar CBS Interactive from encouraging the public to download BitTorrent P2P technology through links and editorial articles.
Tuesday’s ruling came in a lawsuit that was filed by more than a dozen R&B and hip-hop artists led by FilmOn’s Alki David. The plaintiffs allege that the CBS’ digital subsidiaries including CNET and Download.com induced copyright infringement by pointing users to P2P software such as Grokster and Limewire and writing about how to use the software and how to remove digital rights protections.
Last year, U.S. District Judge Dale Fischer denied CBS’ motion to dismiss the suit. The plaintiffs followed up by motioning for a preliminary injunction, but Fischer ruled that the plaintiffs haven’t met their burdens in attaining such a measure.
The ruling seems to backtrack slightly from Fischer’s opinion in July in which he wrote that distributing P2P software while at the same time providing explicit commentary on that software’s effectiveness “does not directly implicate any First Amendment issues.”
Now, in his denial of an injunction (read here), the judge wrote that there are aspects of this lawsuit that “suggests that Plaintiffs’ goal goes far beyond stopping actual infringement by Defendants and extends instead to silencing public discussion of P2P technologies.”
CBSI strongly opposed what the plaintiffs were asking for in court papers last month, arguing, “Any suggestion that reporting on the distribution of authorized, noninfringing music through the BitTorrent protocol evidences intent to induce infringement is simply absurd.”
Fischer didn’t draw such a line in the sand, but he did agree that in the plaintiffs’ burdens in obtaining an objection — showing a likelihood of prevailing and irreparable harm — “there must be at least some evidence that future infringement may occur.”
He wrote, “While there might be some evidence of past inducement of copyright infringement, there is no evidence of any ongoing distribution of any file-sharing software with the object of promoting its use to infringe copyright, as shown by clear expression or other affirmative steps taken to foster infringement.”
The judge noted that the evidence of possible inducement comes from CNET reviews that “were published a decade ago” and that other articles merely discussed P2P issues.
“The Court has no reason to believe that Defendants will purposefully encourage copyright infringement now or in the foreseeable future,” he added.
CBS’ opposition to the injunction drew some attention because it came in the wake of a new policy by the company not to publish reviews on CNET of technologies such as Dish Network’s Hopper and Aereo’s TV streaming device mired in pending litigation with CBS.
Email: firstname.lastname@example.org; Twitter: @eriqgardner
Sign up for THR news straight to your inbox every day