- Share this article on Facebook
- Share this article on Twitter
- Share this article on Email
- Show additional share options
- Share this article on Print
- Share this article on Comment
- Share this article on Whatsapp
- Share this article on Linkedin
- Share this article on Reddit
- Share this article on Pinit
- Share this article on Tumblr
In March, The Hollywood Reporter responded to an allegation by Deadline.com of so-called “stolen” stories by asking Deadline.com to provide specifics. We got no response, and today we know why.
Deadline.com’s parent company PMC has just sued The Hollywood Reporter for copyright infringement based on allegations of “stolen” stories. An initial review of the complaint shows that it is replete with examples of stories that originated from widely-released press releases from publicists, or widespread confirmations from publicists to numerous outlets, including both The Hollywood Reporter and Deadline.com. It is not copyright infringement to report these stories, even if on occasion Deadline.com posts them first.
This lawsuit is yet another attempt to steer attention away from the ongoing growth of The Hollywood Reporter, including its 4.4 million visitors per month as measured by comScore in comparison to Deadline.com’s 1.5 million. The Hollywood Reporter is proud of its original journalism that has driven our growth, and we look forward to responding to this lawsuit in court at the appropriate time.
PMC’s complaint also alleges that The Hollywood Reporter has open job offers to PMC employees, even though this has nothing to do with any allegations of copyright infringement. It also is untrue.
Lastly, today was the first we heard about any allegation regarding the code for the “carousel” feature on our website, which was coded for us by a third-party vendor. We take the allegation seriously and have, as of today, removed the carousel feature while we look into the matter. Unlike with its meritless allegations of stolen stories, Deadline.com did not give us the standard courtesy of advance notice or opportunity to investigate the coding issue before it sued and sought publicity.
We look forward to defending ourselves in court.