- Share this article on Facebook
- Share this article on Twitter
- Share this article on Email
- Show additional share options
- Share this article on Print
- Share this article on Comment
- Share this article on Whatsapp
- Share this article on Linkedin
- Share this article on Reddit
- Share this article on Pinit
- Share this article on Tumblr
The legal battle between Pharrell Williams and will.i.am over “I Am Other” is over. The two sides have reached a settlement, The Hollywood Reporter has learned.
VIDEO: Oscars: Pharrell Williams Dances With Lupita Nyong’o, Meryl Streep on ‘Happy’
The fight started at the U.S. Trademark Office where Williams’ company attempted to register “I Am Other.” That brought an objection from the Black Eyed Peas frontman and his own I.Am.Symbolic company.
Last July, Williams filed a lawsuit in New York federal court seeking a declaratory judgment of trademark noninfringement. With trademarks serving the purpose of protecting against confusion, the plaintiff looked primed to make the argument that the mark in question expressly disclaimed an association between the pop stars.
According to the lawsuit, “The I AM OTHER mark means ‘I am something else,’ leaving what that ‘else’ is to the imagination of the consumer. It certainly does not mean “I am Will’ or in any way suggest Defendants or the WILL.I.AM mark.”
STORY: Pharrell Williams vs. will.i.am: What to Know About This Trademark Fight
Williams also made an argument that will.i.am’s hold over “I Am” trademarks on clothing goods and other accessories was weak. The plaintiff pointed to rejections by a trademark examiner, Dr. Seuss‘ use of the words “Sam I am” from the book Green Eggs and Ham, and at least 146 artists (I Am Virgin, I Am Ghost, I Am Band …) using derivations of “I Am” as their band moniker.
The lawsuit then brought an interesting counterclaim from will.i.am, who attempted to use Pharrell Williams’ involvement in a lawsuit over Robin Thicke‘s “Blurred Lines,” along with Williams’ co-founding of a record label called Star Trak Entertainment, as evidence of disrespect for intellectual property.
But there won’t be any consumer surveys about which artist is most closely associated with “I Am Other” nor any jury trial, after the parties informed a judge that they had reached an agreement in principle. The two sides are now drafting the settlement agreement. Terms aren’t known, as the lawyers couldn’t immediately be reached for comment.
STORY: The Oddest Thing About will.i.am’s Trademark Claim Against Pharrell Williams
Last year, Williams said he thought the situation was “ridiculous” and said he was a guy “who likes to talk things out.”
Appears he has.
Sign up for THR news straight to your inbox every day