
A Ferrari 458 Italia transforms into an Autobot named Dino.
Courtesy of Ferrari- Share this article on Facebook
- Share this article on Twitter
- Share this article on Flipboard
- Share this article on Email
- Show additional share options
- Share this article on Linkedin
- Share this article on Pinit
- Share this article on Reddit
- Share this article on Tumblr
- Share this article on Whatsapp
- Share this article on Print
- Share this article on Comment
The “Steve McQueen Effect” is about to be tested in a Los Angeles court.
As explained in a new lawsuit brought by McQueen’s children, anything associated with the deceased movie legend — “especially cars — drives value. As examples, the complaint points to a 1970 Porsche 917K featured in the McQueen film Le Mans that auctioned for over $14 million a year ago.
Now, however, Ferrari finds itself answering for “The McQueen,” said to be special-edition automobile allegedly marketed through the use of the late actor’s persona.
According to the complaint, Chad McQueen personally visited Ferrari in 2011, meeting the then-chairman of the automaker and expressing interest in a special McQueen car provided he and his family would maintain approval rights. According to the complaint, the McQueen family was subsequently “shocked when they learned, in 2017, that Ferrari had, without notice or authorization, begun marketing and selling a special edition Ferrari that Ferrari entitled ‘The McQueen.'”
Related Stories
Ferrari advertised the vehicle online and distributed brochures that incorporated McQueen’s photo, continues the complaint. That is, until the McQueen family objected.
“Although Ferrari renamed the car in question ‘The Actor,’ Ferrari continues to reference Steve McQueen expressly on the Ferrari webpage for ‘The Actor,’ and there can be no reasonable question as to which ‘Actor’ Ferrari is linking to the car,” states the complaint.
With claims of trademark infringement, false endorsement and misappropriation of the right of publicity, the plaintiffs represented by attorneys at Browne George Ross demand $1 million in compensatory damages, and $2 million in statutory damages per registered trademark.
THR Newsletters
Sign up for THR news straight to your inbox every day