- Share this article on Facebook
- Share this article on Twitter
- Share this article on Email
- Show additional share options
- Share this article on Print
- Share this article on Comment
- Share this article on Whatsapp
- Share this article on Linkedin
- Share this article on Reddit
- Share this article on Pinit
- Share this article on Tumblr
Burberry has come under fire for burning $38 million worth of unsold clothing and beauty products in order to protect its brand.
Many on social media have criticized the company for wastefully destroying clothing instead of putting it on sale or donating it to charitable cause, as part of a practice used by luxury brands to keep their products in the hands of only those who can afford it at full price.
Burberry’s annual report, released in June 2018, says, “The cost of finished goods physically destroyed in the year was £28.6m [about $37.8 million], including £10.4m of destruction for beauty inventory.” In 2017, they burned £26.9 million worth — all in the name of exclusivity.
An open letter posted Wednesday afternoon by online resale giant thredUp called out the British brand, saying, “We can’t afford to waste perfectly good clothes anymore. We are in the midst of an environmental crisis exacerbated by the fashion industry.” It claims the fashion industry causes 10 percent of global carbon emissions.
“Today we invite you to send any unsold Burberry product to thredUp for resale back into the circular economy, and we’ll donate 100 percent of the proceeds to the environmental charity of your choice.”
— thredUP (@thredUP) July 25, 2018
Carole Frances Lung-Bazile, an arts professor at California State University L.A., tells The Hollywood Reporter: “These acts of brand protection are not surprising, just another confirmation about capitalism and an economy based on constant consumption, which is a race to the bottom for labor and the environment.”
Burberry says the energy that was released from burning the clothing was captured, making it environmentally friendly, the BBC reports.
“Burberry has careful processes in place to minimise the amount of excess stock we produce,” a spokesperson tells THR. “On the occasions when disposal of products is necessary, we do so in a responsible manner and we continue to seek ways to reduce and revalue our waste. This is a core part of our Responsibility strategy to 2022 and we have forged partnerships and committed support to innovative organizations to help reach this goal. One example is our partnership with the Ellen MacArthur Foundation’s Make Fashion Circular Initiative, where we join other leading organisations to work towards a circular fashion economy.”
Brand fans of Burberry include Cara Delevingne, Tom Holland, Suki Waterhouse, Zendaya, Keira Knightley, Bella Hadid, Kendall Jenner and Lily James. Kanye and Kim Kardashian-loved designer Riccardo Tisci was recently appointed the new chief creative officer of the brand, and will debut his first runway collection for Burberry during September’s London Fashion Week.
Twitter users also spoke up about the wastefulness and ethics of Burberry’s decisions, including actor Russell Brand, who wrote, “This makes you feel an odd sense of anguish and doom.” Others pointed out that many fashion brands follow suit, and Burberry doesn’t deserve the sole blame for sticking to the status quo.
Hey, @Burberry, there is no need to burn $28 mil worth of stock! Donate it to school foundations that can auction or sell it to help educate your future designers!
— Kim Jones Iraggi (@kgiraggi) July 19, 2018
Back in 2005 Burberry said this was their worst nightmare as a brand. You can bet this was done specifically to stop it being sold at a discount and potentially end up in the hands of working class people. They would rather burn it then let the poor get ahold of it. Sick really.
— Dr Sammie(@curexcomplex) July 19, 2018
the fact that Burberry burnt almost $40 million worth of clothes & beauty is disgusting to me. that could’ve been donated to women’s shelters & to people that need clothes & such & to people that need that to get jobs & to get on their feet but nope, let’s burn it all like jerks
— Amanda Landingham (@amandilandi) July 19, 2018
i’m so disappointed with burberry. you seriously would rather to burn £28m of excess luxury clothing every year instead of doing a sale? i wouldn’t call it being protective of your “company’s prestige”, i would call it pure stupidity
— L (@basiclyn) July 19, 2018
How sad with all the homeless people in our world to burn clothes. How shallow could Burberry be? Ugh. I’ll NEVER buy Burberry again!!!
— Denise DeLuca (@DeLucaDenise) July 19, 2018
why are people on twitter so heated today about burberry burning millions worth of unsold stock as if every luxury high-end fashion house hasn’t been doing that at the end of every season forever lol
— laura (@DarthLux) July 20, 2018
Sign up for THR news straight to your inbox every day