- Share this article on Facebook
- Share this article on Twitter
- Share this article on Email
- Show additional share options
- Share this article on Print
- Share this article on Comment
- Share this article on Whatsapp
- Share this article on Linkedin
- Share this article on Reddit
- Share this article on Pinit
- Share this article on Tumblr
It wasn’t a negotiation. It was, rather, a once-in-a-generation opportunity to establish a relationship with one of the most successful and acclaimed filmmakers of the 21st century.
Last week, studio heads including Universal’s Donna Langley, Sony’s Tom Rothman and Paramount’s Jim Gianopulos made the trek to Christopher Nolan’s compound in the Hollywood Hills.
There, in the same place Nolan has a full-on postproduction facility and does his editing, the execs read the filmmaker’s script for his latest project, centered on one of the fathers of the atom bomb, J. Robert Oppenheimer, and then discussed conditions.
By Sept. 14, Nolan had made his decision, and Universal now finds itself in the enviable position of distributing the next film from the man behind the multibillion-dollar-grossing Dark Knight trilogy and mind-bending movies including Memento, Inception and Tenet.
The process, done in secret at the highest executive levels, offered insight into the current — and some might say twilight — stage of studio relations with filmmaking talent and theatrical exhibition, as Hollywood movie companies keep facing upheaval in several ways.
Nolan has spent almost all of his moviemaking time since 2002 working with Warner Bros., which at one point built a reputation of being “the filmmaker’s studio.” But times, and the rise of branded IP, have changed that (one could argue that Nolan, with his Batman movies, helped nudge it along), and his once-ironclad relationships with Warners frayed last year with the release of Tenet. Nolan, who enjoyed mutual approval over release dates, and the studio fought over when to release the movie, seeing it push three times before finally opening in September to mediocre box office and middling reviews, both firsts for the man, while other studios pushed their tentpoles into the following year. The filmmaker then took umbrage when the studio put its 2021 slate into a day-and-date release strategy with HBO Max, calling it the “worst streaming service.”
Warners was in the early mix of the Oppenheimer movie talks, but it is unclear whether its executives made the drive to the Nolan estate. If not, it was indeed the closing and locking of the door on an almost two-decade relationship. Warners had no comment.
But when one door closes, a new window (pun intended) opens. To the surprise of several insiders, one company’s executive class invited to make the trek was that of Apple Studios, the tech giant that is making a formidable push into movies and series. The company has spared no expense wooing top talent and is making movies with Martin Scorsese, Leonardo DiCaprio, Will Smith and Scarlett Johansson, among others. This was their chance to make inroads with one of the biggest proponents of the theatrical experience, and they took it.
The project is meant to be a smaller-scale feature film for Nolan, which in his case, meant a production budget of around $100 million and an equal marketing spend, according to sources. He asked for total creative control, 20 percent of first-dollar gross, and a blackout period from the studio wherein the company would not release another movie three weeks before or three weeks after his release. And he asked for what insiders say was around a 100-day theatrical window. (Some sources have said the number was 110 days, with one person saying it was 130 days.) These were, in fact, many of the conditions Nolan was accustomed to enjoying at Warners.
Paramount was out of the mix early. The surprise executive shake-up late last week that saw Gianopulos — also a booster of the theatrical experience — exit the venerable studio to be replaced by eye-on-the-streaming-prize Brian Robbins, nixed it as a contender.
Apple was ready to commit to a theatrical window but nowhere near what the filmmaker wanted.
Sony wanted it desperately and could point to the immense success, both commercial and critical, it enjoyed by backing Quentin Tarantino’s ode to cinema, Once Upon a Time in Hollywood. The studio was a contender to the end.
Then there was Universal, whose chief Langley spent years cultivating a friendly relationship with Nolan and who had already taken in several other Warners’ brands and talent, such as Lego and Dan Lin’s Rideback label. The studio could boast a robust theatrical output, even in the pandemic, and some innovative release strategies. Its infrastructure, both in distribution and marketing, is strong at this time, and, just as importantly — as opposed to some other companies such as MGM about to be gobbled up by Amazon — it is also stable.
“Universal just said, ‘Yes,’” said one insider.
Universal, Sony and Apple had no comment.
There are still things that need to be ironed out and many questions remain. Will the studio really give Nolan a six-week blackout if, say, it wants to schedule a Despicable Me movie, the opposite definition of a historical drama, in the same month as an Oppenheimer picture? And what does the theatergoing landscape even look like for a movie that wouldn’t be released until 2023 or 2024? Could a new paradigm exist?
Hollywood studios are operating without a net right now, as they try to navigate a suppressed box office thanks to the pandemic, the dominance of established brands and libraries, and edicts of building streaming services. Talent is often secondary but still essential in drawing eyeballs, to whatever size screen. While some studios go all in on brands (Disney), and some find themselves at crossroads, Universal is betting on the broad play, stacking various DreamWorks Animation, Illumination and Fast & Furious titles with singular talents, such as M. Night Shyamalan, Jordan Peele and, now, Nolan.
Lesley Goldberg contributed to this report.
Sign up for THR news straight to your inbox every day