The Economics of the A-List

First-dollar-gross deals for old-school talent meant they got a substantial cut of the studio's box-office receipts, regardless of the picture's performance. In the new deals, a break-even amount is established during negotiations so that the star's back-end participation only kicks in once the studio has recouped costs up to that break-even number. In exchange, the talent gets a higher percentage than he would have received in the old model.

For instance, if a star received 5% of first-dollar gross as part of his deal, he would get that money no matter how much revenue the movie made. A $100 million movie that bombs out at $50 million means the star gets $2.5 million off the top while the studio hemorrhages money and everyone gets yelled at but the talent. If that same movie grosses $200 million, the star gets $10 million, and the studio makes some good cash (depending on how much it spent on promotion).

In the break-even model, the star has to wait until the studio collects its $100 million in grosses first, but then he might get, say, 7.5%. So if the movie bombs, the studio still loses money, but it's not handing a bonus to the star for the pleasure. If the movie grosses $200 million, however, the studio makes its money, and the star still gets a $7.5 million bonus -- not insubstantial but less than he would have made in the old model. But if the film crosses $300 million, the star starts making more money than he would have in the old version.
For some, additional gross milestones escalate the after-break-even percentage for having given up the bonus on the downside. James Cameron apparently had a break-even deal on Avatar, but his backend participation after that break-even mark -- which certainly was high -- was astronomically higher than had he cut a deal in the old mold.
"Frankly, it's a really healthy place to be," one tentpole producer says. "If you're going to put your conviction and your career on the line, to be rewarded like that is great." 
comments powered by Disqus