- Share this article on Facebook
- Share this article on Twitter
- Share this article on Email
- Show additional share options
- Share this article on Print
- Share this article on Comment
- Share this article on Whatsapp
- Share this article on Linkedin
- Share this article on Reddit
- Share this article on Pinit
- Share this article on Tumblr
Once upon a time, the Oscars produced the gowns seen and heard around the world by film fans, fashion critics, retailers and designers. The reverberation of one great dress — or one bad one — could ring up millions of dollars or lose them, as memorable Oscar gowns had a trickle-down effect on American and European brand sales, trends, prom gowns, color palettes — even on designers’ makeup lines.
And that’s before the Internet made the dresses and their fashion credits accessible prior to a star even stepping onto the red carpet, thanks to luxury-brand press releases trumpeting who-wore-what down to the shoe and diamond stud. So how did the Oscars get outclassed fashion-wise? For one thing, the competition raised their game: Cannes exploded as a couture runway, social media helped the Met Ball become fashion’s biggest night, and designers jumped into the fray for the Golden Globes, SAG Awards and even the Emmys. But a key reason has been that the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences never really cared about fashion coverage. “They never gave us decent spots on the red carpet,” says a major fashion journalist. “We can’t get quotes from stars or early designer credits from them, so we just don’t cover the Oscar red carpet that much anymore.” Upon hearing such complaints, the Academy PR department has been known to say, “I’m sorry, this is not a fashion show.”
It used to be one — with Jodie Foster, Annette Bening and Michelle Pfeiffer looking regal in Armani, Angelina Jolie exuding sex appeal in Versace and Cher strutting in anything Bob Mackie or almost nothing. In the ‘80s and beyond, the Academy Awards’ red carpet was a platform to reinforce a brand’s fashion values, says historian Bronwyn Cosgrave: “Armani used the Oscars to launch his evening collection, and Prada transformed its identity from nylon backpacks to eveningwear with one dress on Uma Thurman.”
Then, around 2010, suddenly all the gowns looked the same: columns, often sequined or beaded, with no sleeves, no trains, no mistakes — and no fun. Instead of fashion impact, designers began to focus instead on the Oscars as a business and PR opportunity, paying actresses up to $250,000 to wear a dress or up to $1 million for a piece of jewelry. (These days, stylists are even taking a cut: Last May, veteran dresser Jessica Paster admitted at a panel to receiving “anywhere from $30,000 to $50,000” for putting a gown on a client.) Observes Film Fashion founder Susan Ashbrook, who wrangled celebrities for Lanvin, Escada, Herve Leger, Harry Winston and other brands in the heyday of Oscar fashion (say, 1994 to 2010): “It’s the same designers over and over again — Dior, Armani, Versace, Valentino — because after 25 years of working them, they now own the Oscars.”
Unlike the Met Ball, says Peggy Siegal, who is both a New York fashion-event expert and an Oscar campaign vet, “the Oscars has cut back on true glamour because the Hollywood press and fashion police nitpick, and don’t understand European high fashion. The Met Ball is impervious to mainstream schlock celebrity press, so it gets all the good gowns.” Jeweler Kimberly McDonald, who has bedecked Michelle Obama and Halle Berry, says, “Half the actresses at the Oscars are afraid of being bashed. I hear it all the time, even about the jewelry.”
With Oscar fashion increasingly timid, the title of trend incubator goes to the Globes. After Amal Clooney flaunted white opera gloves at last year’s awards, long gloves appeared on the fall/ winter runways of Dries Van Noten, Marc Jacobs and Prada. Emma Stone spearheaded the jumpsuit look with her Lanvin all-in-one. Julianne Moore and Dakota Johnson wore silver sequin gowns, and silver is now a spring 2016 trend. At the Oscars, podium-style dresses are preferred, says Cosgrave. “You can typically tell the actress winning that night. She’ll be wearing sequins that don’t wrinkle and the modern incarnation of the ‘Hollywood tabletop dress,’ what costumers like Adrian and Howard Greer made for starlets photographed from above the waist at a restaurant table” for promotional photographs.
Not to mention that, with the rise of the Globes and other shows as a couture showcase, by the end of February, “it’s all been done. After a month of seeing the most beautiful dresses in the world, people are kind of over it,” says McDonald. Original Oscar stylist Phillip Bloch explains: “At the end of the ‘90s, awards-show season mattered because [actresses] only came out once in a while and looked amazing. They weren’t at an awards show, charity event or gala every week. Awards season is a whole year now.” One stylist, who has dressed many nominees, confides, “The designers are a bit spent by the Oscars. They’ve whipped out all their tricks, and they have other chances to show off, so this one doesn’t matter as much anymore.” Except for the winners: Their quotes go up for films and they often get to keep their jewelry and gowns. The Oscar gowns may not be worth as much in the fashion world — but they do just fine at resale.
This story first appeared in the March 4 issue of The Hollywood Reporter magazine. To receive the magazine, click here to subscribe.
Sign up for THR news straight to your inbox every day