- Share this article on Facebook
- Share this article on Twitter
- Share this article on Flipboard
- Share this article on Email
- Show additional share options
- Share this article on Linkedin
- Share this article on Pinit
- Share this article on Reddit
- Share this article on Tumblr
- Share this article on Whatsapp
- Share this article on Print
- Share this article on Comment
‘Tis the season for Oscar screeners — see here and here — the specially packaged DVDs and/or Blu-Rays of Oscar contenders that studios send to Academy members to try to make sure that their films actually get seen. They also serve to remind voters about the Oscar categories in which the studios want their films and talent to be considered. Many voters refer to their screeners for reminders of their options when they are filling out their nomination ballot.
PHOTOS: 30 Years of Oscar Hosts
So what happens when a screener case that contains a huge error is sent out to voters?
Last week, The Weinstein Co. mailed Oscar voters screeners of Ryan Coogler‘s Fruitvale Station, its Sundance-to-Cannes-to-July-release indie hit. Someone neglected to proofread the case, though. It encouraged voters to consider Melonie Diaz and Octavia Spencer in the lead actress category, not the supporting actress category in which they are actually being pushed. (The film’s sole lead performance comes from actor Michael B. Jordan.)
On Thursday — after someone probably received a call to remember from Harvey Weinstein — TWC’s awards office sent a follow-up e-mail to Academy members. It began: “Dear Academy Member, It has come to our attention that there was a misprint on the packaging of the DVD screener of FRUITVALE STATION. The actresses Melonie Diaz and Octavia Spencer are to be considered in the category of Best Actress In A Supporting Role. If you have not received your screener yet, you will receive it shortly. If you have any questions or issues, please contact our Awards Office…”
VIDEO: Octavia Spencer and the Cast of ‘Fruitvale Station’ Discuss the Film Fest Favorite
Will this blooper actually impact Oscar voting in any meaningful way? We’ll never know for sure, but it’s possible. This year’s best supporting actress Oscar race is unusually wide open — only 12 Years a Slave‘s Lupita Nyong’o and Lee Daniels’ The Butler‘s Oprah Winfrey seem like locks right now. Spencer, more than Diaz, is currently seen as being right on the bubble, along with August: Osage County‘s Margo Martindale and Julia Roberts, Blue Is the Warmest Color‘s Lea Seydoux, Blue Jasmine‘s Sally Hawkins, Her‘s Scarlett Johansson, Mandela: Long Walk to Freedom‘s Naomie Harris, Nebraska‘s June Squibb, Prisoners‘ Melissa Leo and the as-yet-unseen Jennifer Lawrence in American Hustle.
Under these circumstances, if even just a few voters decide not to nominate Spencer in the supporting category — which she won two years ago for The Help — because they believe she is being pushed for the lead, it could complicate her quest for another nom.
Sign up for THR news straight to your inbox every day
More from The Hollywood Reporter
The Last of Us
Bella Ramsey Says They’re Worried Pedro Pascal’s “Daddy” Narrative Has “Gone Too Far”
Taika Waititi, Eva Longoria and Niecy Nash-Betts Talk Leading the Diversity Charge at The Hollywood Reporter’s Raising Our Voices Luncheon
Tallulah Willis Opens Up About Coping With Father Bruce Willis’ Dementia, Says She’s “Known Something Was Wrong for a Long Time”
Sharon Stone Discusses Challenges With Getting Work Since Her Stroke, Rails Against “Anti-Woke Bullsh**” at THR’s Raising Our Voices Event