Deborah Dugan Files Sexual Harassment and Discrimination Complaint Against Recording Academy Over Ouster

Deborah Dugan - Getty - H 2020
Mindy Small/FilmMagic

Deborah Dugan on Tuesday filed an explosive sexual harassment and discrimination complaint with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission against the National Academy of Recording Arts and Sciences after being placed on administrative leave amid allegations of workplace bullying — and, in it, she also claims the Academy's board manipulates the Grammy nomination process.

The Recording Academy on Thursday announced Dugan had been placed on leave from her post as president, telling Billboard it hired two independent third-party investigators to look into concerns that had been raised to its board of trustees. Dugan's lawyer Bryan Freedman told The Hollywood Reporter that his client's ability to respond was "restrained by a 28-page contract and legal threats."

In the EEOC complaint, Dugan alleges that on Dec. 22 she told HR she had been sexually harassed by music lawyer Joel Katz, who is the Academy's general counsel and a former board member. Katz's lawyer Howard Weitzman tells THR his client "emphatically denies" the allegation and will "cooperate in any and all investigations or lawsuits by telling the absolute and whole truth." (His full statement is below.)

Dugan also says she told HR she was asked to hire former CEO Neil Portnow as a consultant and pay him $750,000 despite his bowing away from the Academy "in disgrace after making misogynistic remarks about woman recording artists." She also says the real reason Portnow's contract wasn't renewed is that he's accused of raping a female performer and she alleges that the complaints made against her to the board came from Portnow's executive assistant. 

On Wednesday, Portnow responded to Dugan's claims, calling the allegations of rape "ludicrous and untrue." He added in a statement to The Hollywood Reporter, "An in-depth independent investigation by experienced and highly regarded lawyers was conducted and I was completely exonerated. There was no basis for the allegations and once again I deny them unequivocally." (Read his full statement here.)

The email also complained of "egregious conflicts of interest, improper self-dealing by Board members and voting irregularities with respect to nominations for Grammy Awards," according to the complaint, which describes the Academy as "a 'boys’ club' network where men work together to the disadvantage of women and disenfranchised groups in order to line their own pockets and maintain a firm grip of control on the Academy’s dealings."

Dugan put the Academy on notice that she intended to bring claims and alleges the organization backed out of a nearly-closed settlement and gave her one hour to accept its new offer before putting her on leave. The complaint acknowledges that the allegations against Dugan were made prior to her complaint to HR, but also notes she wasn't put on leave until after she shared her intent to pursue legal action. Now, she says, the board and interim president Harvey Mason Jr. are defaming her.

Also interesting, especially given the Grammy Awards ceremony is set to be held Sunday, is Dugan's characterization of the nominations process. She says submissions are initially voted on by the 12,000 members of the Academy, then the top 20 selections are reviewed by "secret committees" chosen by the board chair and head of awards Bill Freimuth. The committees are tasked with narrowing the 20 potential nominees down to between five to eight, depending on the category.

Dugan alleges the board pushes "artists with whom they have relationships" — sometimes even adding in artists who didn't make the top 20 — lets artists who are in consideration for a nomination to sit on the committee that votes for their category and manipulates the process to ensure certain songs are nominated if Grammys producer Ken Ehrlich wants them performed during the show. 

Another of Dugan's attorneys, Douglas Wigdor, who represents 20 women accusing Harvey Weinstein of sexual misconduct, on Tuesday announced the EEOC complaint on Twitter — and compared the Recording Academy to the embattled film mogul.

"The complaint that we filed today against the National Academy of Recording Arts and Sciences (the Grammys) highlights tactics reminiscent of those deployed by individuals defending Harvey Weinstein," writes Wigdor on Twitter. "As we allege, the attempt by the Recording Academy to impugn the character of Deborah Dugan is a transparent effort to shift the focus away from its own unlawful activity. This blatant form of retaliation in corporate America is all too common, even post #MeToo, and we will utilize all lawful means necessary to ensure that those responsible are held accountable for their actions."

Dugan's claims include unlawful gender discrimination, sexual harassment, unlawful retaliation and unequal pay. (Read the full complaint, below.)

The Recording Academy did not respond to specific allegations in Dugan's complaint, but reiterated its position that Dugan didn't raise the issues until after claims that she had created a "toxic and intolerable" work environment were made against her. The statement reads, in part: “[W]e immediately launched independent investigations to review both Ms. Dugan’s potential misconduct and her subsequent allegations. Both of these investigations remain ongoing. ... Our loyalty will always be to the 21,000 members of the Recording Industry. We regret that Music’s Biggest Night is being stolen from them by Ms. Dugan's actions and we are working to resolve the matter as quickly as possible.”

Here is Weitzman's full statement on behalf of Katz, which references Dugan's claim that the attorney invited her to dinner on May 18, during which he told her she was "very pretty," bragged about being rich, called her "baby" and tried to kiss her: “Ms. Dugan's allegations of harassment and her description of a dinner at the steakhouse in the Ritz Carlton, Laguna Niguel are false and Mr. Katz categorically and emphatically denies her version of that evening," says Weitzman. "This dinner meeting was 2½ months before Ms. Dugan started her job. Mr. Katz believed they had a productive and professional meeting in a restaurant where a number of members of the Board of Trustees of the Academy, and others, were dining. Ms. Dugan's claims are made, for the first time, 7 months after this dinner took place. Mr. Katz will cooperate in any and all investigations or lawsuits by telling the absolute and whole truth. Hopefully Ms. Dugan will do the same.”

Jan. 21, 6:15 p.m. Updated with statement from Joel Katz's attorney Howard Weitzman.
Jan. 22, 9 a.m. Updated with statement from Neil Portnow.