- Share this article on Facebook
- Share this article on Twitter
- Share this article on Email
- Show additional share options
- Share this article on Print
- Share this article on Comment
- Share this article on Whatsapp
- Share this article on Linkedin
- Share this article on Reddit
- Share this article on Pinit
- Share this article on Tumblr
Pete Buttigieg, the 37-year-old mayor who has emerged as an unlikely presidential power player, faced fierce attacks over his fundraising and readiness Thursday night in a high-stakes debate that tested the strength of the fresh-faced Democrat just six weeks before primary voting begins.
A pair of senators onstage emerged as his chief critics, with Elizabeth Warren seizing on his reliance on wealthy donors and Amy Klobuchar challenging his limited governing experience.
In the most pointed exchange, Warren, a 70-year-old Massachusetts senator, zeroed in on Buttigieg’s recent private meeting with wealthy donors inside a California “wine cave,” the details of which were recounted in a recent Associated Press story.
“Billionaires in wine caves should not pick the next president of the United States,” she charged.
Buttigieg, who has surged into the top tier of the Democratic Party’s 2020 primary in part because of his fundraising success, did not back down.
“We need to defeat Donald Trump,” he responded, noting that Trump’s reelection campaign has already accumulated hundreds of millions of dollars. “We shouldn’t try to do it with one hand tied behind our back.”
The focus on Buttigieg at the Los Angeles debate highlighted his strength in the Democratic Party’s turbulent primary contest just 46 days before voting begins, but it also raised broader concerns about the direction of the race: Democrats are not close to unifying behind a message or messenger in their quest to deny Trump a second term.
In fact, as Thursday’s clash revealed, the party is still consumed by a high-stakes tug-of-war between feuding factions that must ultimately come together in order to beat Trump next November. One side, led by Warren and Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders, is demanding transformational change to the U.S. economy and political system. The other, led by former Vice President Joe Biden, Buttigieg and Klobuchar, prefers a more cautious return to normalcy after Trump’s turbulent reign.
Buttigieg, who is polling well in early voting states Iowa and New Hampshire, has been forced to grapple with questions about his fundraising, an issue that has exposed the fissure between the moderate and progressive wings of the party.
Over just the last week, he hosted wealthy donors at a California wine cave, disclosed consulting work for a big insurance company that preceded layoffs and released a list of wealthy bundlers. His challenges with black voters are well documented, but suddenly, Buttigieg’s corporate connections are beginning to alienate the party’s progressive activists.
Protesters aligned with Warren and Sanders tracked him across New York City during a recent fundraising swing, banging pots and pans and calling him “Wall Street Pete.” The 37-year-old seemed genuinely confused by the protests, which he was forced to acknowledge during at least one Manhattan fundraiser because the noise outside was so loud.
“I do not sell access to my time,” Warren said of Buttigieg’s aggressive fundraising schedule.
“As of when, Senator?” Buttigieg fired back, referring to Warren’s reliance on wealthy donors before becoming a presidential candidate.
Klobuchar, a Minnesota senator, went after Buttigieg for criticizing the combined experience of all the senators who participated in a previous debate.
“So while you can dismiss committee hearings, I think this experience works. And I have not denigrated your experience as a local official — I have been one. I just think you should respect our experience when you look at how you evaluate someone who can get things done.”
Buttigieg responded: “You actually did denigrate my experience, Senator.”
Amid the ideological fight, Democrats faced a pointed challenge related to their need to build a diverse coalition to win the general election. For the first time this primary season, no black or Latino candidate appeared onstage.
The omission was embarrassing, at best — and politically dangerous, at worst — as Democrats fight to convince people of color that they’re not taking their vote for granted.
Asked what message the lack of diversity on the debate stage sends, Sanders tried to shift the conversation back to a discussion about climate change.
Admonished by one of the moderators to stick to the question, Sanders countered that people of color will suffer “the most if we do not deal with climate change.”
The only nonwhite candidate on stage, Andrew Yang, called it “both an honor and a disappointment” to be the only candidate of color on the debate stage. He said he missed California Sen. Kamala Harris, who folded her campaign this month, and New Jersey Sen. Cory Booker, who failed to qualify. “I think Cory will be back,” Yang predicted.
Sign up for THR news straight to your inbox every day